-
题目：
多选题
A油炸食物
B过硬食物
C刺激性食物
D半粗纤维食物
E含有果胶的食物
答案：
<查看本题扣1积分>
-
已知某综合布线工程的总预算为1230万元，到目前为止已支出900万元，实际完成了总工作量的60%，该阶段的预算费用是850万元。按目前的状况继续发展，要完成剩余的工作还需要（）万元。
-
小儿指纹鲜红者，多属（）
-
勃拉姆斯是典型的浪漫主义者
-
下列哪些不是颅内压增高者的呕吐特点（）
-
大修后，水泵试运行应达到哪些标准？
-
为什么要进行周期性的停工检修？
-
Java的屏幕坐标是以像素为单位，容器的左下角被确定为坐标的起点。
-
要在同一图像中复制图层，首先在“图层”面板中选择需要复制的图层，然后将选择的图层拖到“图层”面板底部的创建新图层按钮上。
-
给患者吸痰时，对黏稠痰液的处理措施不正确的是（）
-
根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they