人民检察院是国家的（）。_江西省学法用法考试_全学科试题题库

当前学科：江西省学法用法考试

题目：单选
人民检察院是国家的（）。
答案： <查看本题扣1积分>

查看答案

答案不对？请尝试站内搜索

推荐知识点:

患者，女性，50岁。发现右乳肿物1月余。既往有结核史，月经规律。查体：右乳房外上象限触及一2cm×2cm肿物，质中，无压痛，表面不光滑，边界不清楚，活动度好，与局部皮肤有少许粘连。左腋下可扪及1枚肿大淋巴结。对诊断最有价值的辅助检查为（）。

选择性激动β1受体的药物是哪种（）

影响冲裁件毛刺增大的原因是刃口磨钝、（）。

甲苯适于尿中哪些成份防腐（）

通过供应商管理库存并准时向生产企业配送，使生产企业库存为0，称为何种库存管理方式（）。

焊接安全与卫生防护技术的重要意义是什么？

楼层扭转位移控制时为何要考虑质量偶然偏心的影响？

在不变损耗和可变损耗相等的条件下，变压器效率是最高。

根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

慢性粒细胞白血病临床特点是（）