-
根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
-
女性，42岁，劳累后反复发作性黄疸20年。无发热、腹部不适、食欲不振，小便颜色正常。查体：一般情况好，巩膜轻度黄染，皮肤正常，未见肝掌。腹平软，无压痛，肝脾未触及。化验：Hb142g／L，ALT（SGPT）30U／L，总胆红素38．6μmol／L，1分钟胆红素2．6μmol／L，乙肝五项、抗HCV阴性，腹部超声正常。最可能的诊断是（）
-
省级人民政府在接到突发公共卫生事件报告后，向国务院（卫生行政部门）报告的时限是突发事件监测机构、医疗卫生机构和有关单位在发现突发公共卫生事件后，向所在地县级人民政府卫生行政主管部门报告的时限是
-
关于财产保险与人身保险的比较，下列说法错误的是（）。
-
往复式压缩机不可通过压缩机主轴驱动的主油泵为（），由于其压力较低，不能满足为高压气缸注油的需求，只能通过往（）才能实现对气缸的注油。
-
在转介客户前应对客户需求先进行必要挖掘。
-
确诊蛛网膜下隙出血的检查是（）
-
（）的主要作用是改变刀具与工件的受力情况和刀头的散热条件。
-
在闭口闪点测定中，火焰调整到接近球形，其直径大小为（）毫米。
-
关于子宫破裂，正确的是（）